• Video
  • Shop
  • Culture
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Food
  • Living
  • Style
  • Travel
  • News
  • Book Club
  • GMA3: WYNTK
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Contact Us
  • © 2025 ABC News
  • News

Bizarre Parrot Custody Battle Settled

ByGood Morning America
April 07, 2009, 12:55 PM

April 7, 2009 — -- When he looked over his courtroom to see two emotional women and one very loud, squawking parrot, Palm Beach County Judge James Martz put into words what many were thinking

."As we sit here right now, this is an unusual case to say the least," he said.

On Monday, Martz concluded a four-month custody battle between two Boca Raton, Fla., women who both claimed to own an African Grey parrot named Tequila, or Lucky depending on who's speaking, by naming one of the women, Angela Colicheski, the owner of the bird.

"I see two people who are genuinely attached to the bird," Martz said.

But in the end, Martz said that according to Florida law, "pets are chattel, they're no different than your automobile" and therefore the parrot belonged to Colicheski, who owned the bird first.

Three years ago Colicheski lived with the bird, which she called Tequila, until it flew away one day.

"We were just outside, out the door," she said. "He flew over the pool, over the fence. I went running after."

Eventually, the parrot ended up with Sarita Lytell who took the bird in and started calling him Lucky.

"The bird was out for 11 days on its own and would have died," an emotional Lytell said recently.

Life went on as usual for three years, until January when Colicheski and Lytell had a chance encounter at a Dunkin' Donuts. The women chatted and the conversation turned to their love for parrots. That's when they realized they were talking about the same parrot.

After the realization, Colicheski said she wanted the parrot back but Lytell refused to give it up. Colicheski soon took legal action and sued to get the $2,000 bird back.

At the hearing Monday, the parrot was present and squawking, but did not testify.

Lytell's attorney Marcy LaHart said she ought to keep the bird because she had cared for it for three years.

Martz quickly decided the bird was equivalent to lost property and returned the parrot to an ecstatic Colicheski. Martz also dismissed Lytell's countersuit for the cost of caring for the bird.

"I'm never going to lose him again," Colicheski said.

Up Next in News—

Hero neighbor speaks out after rushing to help plane crash passengers

July 15, 2025

Elmo X account hacked, posts 'antisemitic and racist messages,' Sesame Workshop says

July 14, 2025

6 months after Eaton Fire, family that lost 9 homes tries to rebuild

July 14, 2025

Dad speaks out after life-threatening boat incident during Bahamas vacation

July 9, 2025

Shop GMA Favorites

ABC will receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

The latest lifestyle and entertainment news and inspiration for how to live your best life - all from Good Morning America.
  • Contests
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Info
  • Children’s Online Privacy Policy
  • Advertise with us
  • Your US State Privacy Rights
  • Interest-Based Ads
  • About Nielsen Measurement
  • Press
  • Feedback
  • Shop FAQs
  • ABC News
  • ABC
  • All Videos
  • All Topics
  • Sitemap

© 2025 ABC News
  • Privacy Policy— 
  • Your US State Privacy Rights— 
  • Children's Online Privacy Policy— 
  • Interest-Based Ads— 
  • Terms of Use— 
  • Do Not Sell My Info— 
  • Contact Us— 

© 2025 ABC News